As the “Big Three” teeter with collapse, three million workers around the nation face the looming possibility of job loss. They have not seen economic success in several years, and are treading dangerously close with having no financial capital with which to operate their respective companies.
Why? They have resisted change. Body designs, amenities, and features in automobiles certainly have changed in recent years. But the business practices have remained largely the same. Japanese and other foreign auto industries have successfully dealt with changing needs and consumer demands. The environment is becoming a growing concern. Oil is a unstable commodity that we are hoping to steer ourselves away from holistic dependance on.
It was not until the past few years that American automotive makers began to realize they needed to change. American’s were opting to buy foreign-made cars that were more fuel-efficient over the design and muscle of American vehicles. Jumping on the ship so late has cost General Motors (GM), Ford, and Chrysler billions in expenses, and put their corporations in danger of bankruptcy.
Questions have been brought up during Congressional hearings with American auto industry executives as to the necessity of such bailout measures. Would bailing out another industry in hard economic times prove fruitful? According to the auto industry, the alternative would be far more catastrophic. Not offering $25 billion in economic stimulus aid would result in a sure collapse of the industry. The loss of an industry that comprises approximately 4% of this country’s GDP would be catastrophic. The loss of jobs would be in the millions, the loss in American income in the billions. The economy – even worse off.
The problem is – we can not trust these companies based on their past business practices. Shelling out billions of dollars in economic aid is not the answer. The government should rather devise a package in which it offers these companies a chance to turn themselves around, and reward these companies for doing so, with government loans that are required to be paid back.
The government has bailed out an auto manufacturer before. In 1979, Chrysler received $1.2 billion in government loans as it faced bankruptcy. And less than four years later, Chrysler paid the government back every dollar, with interest. Chrysler used the bailout funds to restructure and get their act together. And in doing so, they were able to turn profits to such a degree that they were able to pay back the government all money owed.
We can not issue a blank check to the auto industry today. Giving them a $25 billion economic stimulus aid package will only go towards operating expenses and cover purchasing capital. It will not go towards restructuring or reworking their business models. The government has recognized this, and will not simply issue out a blank-check aid package. The best result out of this situation, for the American people, for the economy, and for the auto industry, is a rewards-based aid package which offers financial aid to the companies who have proven they can dig themselves out of their current sleuths of messes.
And to put things simply, Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger called out the Detroit auto manufacturers at a luncheon speech, calling on Detroit to “get of [their] butts.”
Photo Credit: New York Times Archives and American Elephants
Popularity: 1%
